banner1.jpg


March 07, 2007

RAD - What every adoptive parent should know

My first introduction to the term 'RAD' was well into our adoption planning. The subject was only two years old when she joined her adoptive family...but she would spend years in special treatment and RAD programs. I had assumed adoptive families wanted "babies" for selfish reasons. But now came the realization that a lack of attention, love or family could contribute to permanent damage to a child. The recent delays in the adoption process have not convinced me that there is more "oversight" necessarily...but the fact remains that the children are coming home a little older. Could the delays mean that attachment disorders are on the rise in Guatemala? That might be hard to determine. Afterall, the term RAD used to be a category for SEVERE attachment disorders somehow a line in the sand beyond attachment 'issues". In fact, every adopted child is somewhat traumatized by transitions and/or institutionalized care. Here is an article that explains this theory much better than I can....
A new refridgerator mother? - Mom, what's in the fridge?

3/10 - As one of our commenters mentioned, this is just a tip of the iceberg and comparing RAD to autism. Some of the articles I had prior to this are no longer valid links. However, here is what I wrote about attachment earlier and a few good links to start with...

Attachment Parenting...for me?

Radkids.org
Presentation on RAD

Posted by Kelly at March 7, 2007 04:23 PM
Comments

This article appears to be more along the lines of what constitutes RAD vs. autism, rather than what RAD is and can mean to parents. There is a lot of information on RAD and if you're interested in it, read more than just this article.

Posted by: Lynn at March 8, 2007 05:42 PM

As a teacher who works with children with autism I was shocked at the article and even more shocked the writer is/claims to be autistic. First of all the article states children with RAD may have had birthmothers with depression or the birthmother may be emotionally unattached. This is NOT TRUE for children with autism. Many studies on autism clearly state that autism is NOT caused by anything the birthmother may be feeling. The term refirgerator mother has been disproved many times and is EXTREMELY offensive to many loving parents of children with autism. The aritcle suggests that children with autism may be born into challenging environments, I know MANY people without autism who have been born into horrible environments and many children with autism whose birth and home life are more than ideal. The question if children with autism being able to sense or not, is totally irrelevant. Many children with autism do sense. They sense everything to an extreme and are in a constant state of sensory overload. That is part of the reason they separate themselves from others, NOT because of the birth mother. AS far as suggesting the autism rate has gone up because mothers are too busy to bond with their children, is non-scientific. Possible changes in environment (air,water,etc), better diagnostic materials, acceptance of autism as a developmental disorder, and several possible "autism genes" are all being researched as to why the epidemic is taking place. There are no studies if a busy birthmother will be emotionally unavailable or will be too involved with her computer to care for her child. Scientists know better! Even the author knew the article was not accurate. That is why there was a disclaimer at the end. Yes there are some similiarities of they symptoms of autism and RAD, this means nothing. There are also similiar symptoms between a heartburn and a heart attack. One would hope that the real professionals would know the difference !!!!

Posted by: Andrea at March 13, 2007 12:54 AM

Andrea - Thanks for commenting on this. I re-read the article and can see what you are saying. I found this article after seeing a report on being able diagnose autism in young babies (earlier for *some* children but not all). I was amazed that the most obvious symptom was the child NOT making eye contact with the parent. This is also a red flag with RAD (and I am only speaking in VERY young children who cannot express themselves well). So, when I saw the bullet points on this, I *drilled* in on the possiblity of a child being mis-diagnosed as autistic as opposed to having RAD (or at least ignoring the possibility of RAD affecting the situation). Since this was something I saw happen, I suspect that parents might also miss it. But I would not say that the symptoms are so much the same as a child grows. I was looking at this as more of a defaulting back to autism when the doctor is not familiar with RAD.

I think that any family experiencing odd behavior...like a child refusing to make eye contact or interact with the parent should consider formal diagnosis.

I did not see the article as so much saying that they are alike or that birthmother depression might cause autism. My interpretation was that RAD or attachment issues COULD contribute to the problem.

Still, I am on the lookout for one of my favorite in-depth articles on RAD.

Posted by: Kelly (guatadopt.com) at March 18, 2007 04:14 PM

Kelly: Even though I don't agree with parts of the article, I do understand your reasoning for posting it. I commend you (and the rest of Guatadopt.com) for keeping your readers informed about everything involved in Guatemalan adoptions. Your web page is greatly appreciated. :) Andrea

Posted by: Andrea at March 28, 2007 03:12 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?