Thank you all for your concern. Kelly and I are alive and well. We haven't posted in a few days primarily because I was out of town at a Specialty Coffee Convention (my real job) and Kelly has been battling technical issues with our Do Good project so that we can get it up and running (and figure out why some are having a hard time ordering calendars). But it is no joke when we say that it means a lot to know that our readers get worried when we're absent. We hope that someday we'll be able to have someone dedicated full time to Guatadopt and Do Good, but for the time being we do the best we can. So click on more for latest happenings, most of which is probably not new news.
New DOS Statement http://travel.state.gov/family/adoption/intercountry/intercountry_3840.html
Following my little tirade last week about DOS interference in the Guatemalan Congress’s right to determine its own Hague/Ortega implementation date, DOS released a new statement. It doesn’t say much at all and is once again designed to scare off anyone considering accepting a new referral. PLEASE do not take this to be an endorsement from Guatadopt to accept a referral at this point time. The situation is extremely tenuous and anyone considering it should realize what they might be getting themselves into. There is risk in when and how a case might be completed and very likely in how long it will take. My statement is merely to say that DOS has the ability to stop new referrals if it so desires and that they seem to be trying to force Guatemala into doing their dirty work, which I do not approve of.
Some have commented that my post about DOS contradicts our earlier calls to action for DOS. I do not believe this to be the case. Here's how I see it:
1.) Grandfathering – I believe this threat has been used as a red herring, Nonetheless, advocating for grandfathering has to do with in process cases. It is the US government lobbying for good faith agreements entered into by PAPs who signed legal contracts for an existing legal system. Just imagine if this instead had to do with coffee or something like that. If companies had entered into good faith legal agreements, wouldn't it seem proper that the US would advocate that Guatemala honor them? Now, it is horrible to compare children with coffee beans! But in reality that only further makes the point. There are real living children with real families waiting for them in the US. Far more important than coffee!
2.) Ortega lobbying/implementation date - here you are talking about something different. Now you are talking about what Guatemala's system is. This is interference. I get some lobbying. But in this case, here and now, you are talking about the fact that DOS got what it wanted with Ortega. But the Congress had the sense to know Jan 1 is too soon. DOS is just upset that it will extend how long there are pipeline cases post US Hague ratification. This has nothing to do with current in process cases. This has to do with the potential for new cases. DOS's goal since around March has been to end new referrals. That's why they've issued the FAQs and warnings. That's why they asked agencies to close their programs.
So I see no contradiction. One is respect of living children in the process and good faith agreements entered into by US citizens. The other is trying to influence a country's sovereign right to make and implement its own rules.
New JCICS Statement: http://www.jcics.org/Guatemala.htm
JCICS issued a new statement today. Like the DOS one, not much new. I respect JCICS making sure everyone realizes they still don’t recommend giving out new referrals. It is factually correct though I think it once again overstates the risk to in-process cases.
Casa Quivira
I am happy to report that it appears as though the Casa Quivira mess may be coming to an end. Nearly all of the children are back at CQ and the hold on the cases has been lifted. Events around all of this have spiraled out of control and I don’t wish to get into taking any position. But what I will say is that while everything is not cleared up for all the cases, it does look like at last innocent children are not going to be caught in the middle of the politics and tensions that exist in Guatemalan adoptions and that they will achieve permanency in a loving, family environment.
We are still waiting on the appeals court to make a decision regarding our daughter. We have been waiting for a decision for over 10 weeks. We started the adoption process over 2.5 years ago.
Jackie
Posted by: Jackie at November 12, 2007 05:56 PMI am elated to hear about the progress with CQ! Finally, our prayers are being answered for those poor children and their families! Where can we get more details? I want to know the full scoop!
Rachel
CQ parent here, also interested in the full scoop!
Rachel, if you find out where to hear it- please let us know.
Kevin
Do you have any idea when congress is going to pass the Propsed amendments. The waiting is killing me!!!
Karen
Posted by: Karen at November 14, 2007 02:27 PMI am not sure it this is the right spot for this or if it will get posted before it is too late to watch. The 10:00 news tonight on channel 12 in Milwaukee WI is featuring a segment on Guatemalan adoptions and how the DOS is and is not supporting waiting families. I for one am curious as to the spin they will put on it.
Posted by: Cathy at November 14, 2007 08:41 PMI don't know when the Congress will vote on the ammendments. I thought it would have happened by now. My guess is that they are trying to reach consensus on them so a vote result is known before they make it official. Plus there is the political wrangling with DOS over an implementation date.
Anyone can check the website of the Guatemala Congress to see what is on the agenda (though sometimes they vote on stuff not listed).
The url is: http://www.congreso.gob.gt/
Click on:
Orden del Día publicada más reciente
Even if you don't know Spanish, you'll be able to tell if this one is on there - "adopciones".
Kevin
Guatadopt.com
If you want to follow the cogress or the daily newspaper Prense Libre, here is a tip. Search the link on google first and it will provide you with an atomatic translater in the search results.
Posted by: jrh at November 14, 2007 09:34 PMLatest News
El Periodico
Actualidad: Nacionales
MP analiza accionar contra Juzgado por la devolución de 15 niños
La Fiscalía considera que esa acción podría afectar la investigación.
Claudia Acuña /elPeriódico
redaccion@elperiodico.com.gt
Recomendar
Más enviados
Formato impresión
El Ministerio Público (MP) analiza la posibilidad de presentar un amparo contra la decisión del Juzgado Primero de la Niñez y la Adolescencia en la que se ordenó el traslado y devolución de 15 niños a Casa Quivira.
De acuerdo con Alex Colop, a cargo de la unidad contra trata de personas de la Fiscalía contra el Crimen Organizado, a pesar de que el MP no es parte directa en el proceso, esta resolución podría afectar la investigación abierta.
En el proceso penal, la Fiscalía solicitó que las dos notarias ligadas al proceso sean escuchadas por el delito de trata de personas.Las pesquisas determinaron que existen anomalías en los documentos utilizados en las adopciones que se realizaban a través del hogar intervenido en agosto.
Hasta el momento, el Juzgado ha realizado varias audiencias en las que se ha escuchado a las partes interesadas. Sin embargo, no todas las madres naturales han comparecido.
De acuerdo con la Procuraduría General de la Nación, los trámites de adopción de estos menores están suspendidos y aún deben depurar algunos de estos expedientes. Además, algunas de las madres han manifestado que desean de regreso a sus hijos.
A inicios de esta semana, la juez Roxana Maribel Mena Guzmán presentó un oficio a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en el que denuncia acoso laboral por parte de la organización Casa Alianza. El objetivo es que la Corte determine no sólo si se trata de un hostigamiento, sino que se aclaren ante la opinión pública sus actuaciones que, según ella, están apegadas a las leyes.
Según Leonel Dubón, de Casa Alianza, la organización es asesora del hogar Amor del Niño, donde estuvieron los 15 niños hasta el pasado viernes, cuando fueron devueltos a Casa Quivira.
Dubón indicó que para ellos las investigaciones no han sido profundas y que el proceso ha sido acelerado.
Posted by: gaby at November 15, 2007 11:57 PM